Theoretical Functional Calculations (DFT) Studies of Structural Properties of 1-Benzoyl-3-[(2-benzyl Sulfanyl) phenyl]thiourea with Comparison of Experimental Data
Shima Siahgali*, Shahriar Ghammamy
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: shghamamiii@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT:
In this paper, we report an inter-comparison of various physical and electronic properties of C21H18N2OS2 The molecular geometry, vibrational frequencies, energies and natural bond orbital (NBO) in the ground state are calculated by using the DFT (B3LYP) methods with LANL2DZ. The geometries and normal modes of vibrations obtained from B3LYP calculations are in good agreement with the experimentally observed data.
KEY WORDS:.
1. INTRODUCTION:
In the title compound figuar1, C21H18N2OS2, a strong intermolecular N-H…Ohydrogen bond [N…O=2.642(3) Å] between the amid N atom and the benzoyl atom from an almost planer six-membered ring in the centeral part of the molecule.
Thiourea is an organosulfur compound with theformula SC(NH2)2 . It is structurally similar to urea, except that the oxygen atom is replaced by asulfur atom, but the properties of urea and thiourea differ significantly Thiourea is a reagent in organic synthesis. "Thioureas" refers to a broad class of compounds with the general structure (R1R2N)(R3R4N)C=S. Thioureas are related to thioamides, e.g. RC(S)NR2, where R is methyl,ethyl, etc.
Thiourea is a planar molecule. The C=S bond distance is 1.60 ±0.1 Å for thiourea (as well as many of its derivatives). The material has the unusual property of changing to ammonium thiocyanate upon heating above 130 °C. Upon cooling, the ammonium salt converts back to thiourea. Thioureas are used a building blocks to pyrimidine derivatives, Thiourea is a reagentin organic synthesis.
Substituted thioureas are useful catalysts for organic synthesis. Other industrial uses of thiourea include production of flame retardant resins, and vulcanizationaccelerators. It is also used to tone silver-gelatin photographic prints.[1-5]
We applied the DFT method to optimize and calculate molecular data of compound. The calculation was done by using the Gaussian 09 programs AD (1993), Becke For DFT, Becke’s three-parameter exchange functional CT (1988), Lee was used in combination with the Lee–Yang–Parr correlation functional (B3LYP) with LANL2DZbasis set. Density functional theory methods were employed and determine the optimized structures of C21H18N2OS2 can be seen figuar 2. [6-7]
Figure-1 The molecular structure of the title compoundC21H18N2OS2.
2. EXPERIMENTAL:
2.1 Computational method:
All computational are carried out using Gaussian 09 program [7-8] which combines the exact Hartree-Fock exchange with Becke,s and uses the Lee-Yang-Parr correlation function in order to include the most important correlation effects. The structures of the molecules were completely optimized without any symmetry in all the levels. The optimized structural parameters were used in the vibrational frequency calculations at the DFT levels to characterize all stationary points as minima. Infrared intensities (int) in Kilometer per mole of all compounds were performed at the same level on the respective fully optimized geometries.
Figure-2-Optimized geometries of C21H18N2OS2 at B3LYP/LanL2DZ level of theory.
2.2 Frontier molecular orbital
Both the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) are the main orbital take part in chemical stability. The HOMO represents the ability to donate an electron, LUMO as an electron acceptor represents the ability to obtain an electron. The HOMO and LUMO energy were calculated by B3LYP/LANL2DZ method. This electronic absorption corresponds to the transition from the ground to the first excited state and is mainly described by one electron excitation from the highest occupied molecular or orbital (LUMO). Therefore, while the energy of the HOMO is directly related to the ionization potential, LUMO energy is directly related to the electron affinity. Energy difference between HOMO and LUMO orbital is called as energy gap that is an important stability for structures. 3D plots of highest occupied molecular orbitals (HOMOs) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals (LUMOs) are shown in (Figure 4).
Figure-3-Crystal packing diagram for the title compound. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed line
Figure-4 The atomic orbital of the frontier molecular orbital for C21H18N2OS2 at B3LYP/LanL2DZ level of theory.
2.3 NBO study on structures
Natural bond orbital (NBO) methods’ refers to a suite of mathematical algorithms for analyzing electronic wave functions in the language of localized Lewis-like chemical bonds. In these methods, molecular properties are expressed in terms of a ‘natural Lewis structure’ (NLS) depiction of the wave function, in direct correspondence to the elementary Lewis dot diagram of freshman chemistry. NBOs can be described as a ‘chemist’s basis set’ that allows any aspect of the wave function to be expressed in terms of L- versus NL-type contributions, thereby providing a bridge between modern wave function technology and elementary valency and bonding concepts [9-10] . NBO analysis is carried out by examining all possible interactions between 'filled' (donor) Lewis-type NBOs and 'empty' (acceptor) non-Lewis NBOs, and estimating their energetic importance by 2nd-order perturbation theory. Since these interactions lead to loss of occupancy from the localized NBOs of the idealized Lewis structure into the empty non-Lewis orbitals (and thus, to departures from the idealized Lewis structure description), they are referred to as 'delocalization' corrections to the zeroth-order natural Lewis structure. For each donor NBO (i) and acceptor NBO (j), the stabilization energy E(2) associated with delocalization ("2e-stabilization") is estimated.
Table 1:Comparative experimental and DFT study of geometrical parameters of 1-Benzoyl-3-[(2-benzyl Sulfanyl)phenyl]thiourea some selected bond lengths (Å) Crystal data of1-Benzoyl-3-[(2-benzyl Sulfanyl)phenyl]thiourea
|
angles (◦) |
Bond lengths DFT (Å) |
angles (◦) |
Bond lengths Experimental (Å) |
|
1.40 |
C1-C2 |
1.38(5) |
C12-C13 |
|
1.406 |
C1-C6 |
1.39(5) |
C13-C14 |
|
1.412 |
C5-C6 |
1.401(4) |
C9-C14 |
|
1.394 |
C3-C4 |
1.398(5) |
C10-C11 |
|
1.408 |
C2-C3 |
1.384(5) |
C11-C12 |
|
1.446 |
C12-C13 |
1.508(5) |
C15-C16 |
|
1.283 |
C28-O29 |
1.230(4) |
C7-O1 |
|
1.397 |
C28-N27 |
1.381(4) |
C7-N1 |
|
1.837 |
C25-S26 |
1.674(3) |
C8-S2 |
|
2.00 |
C4-S11 |
1.786(3) |
C10-S1 |
|
1.08 |
C33-H38 |
0.949(4) |
C3-H3 |
|
1.086 |
C2-H8 |
0.950(4) |
C12-H12 |
|
1.086 |
C20-H23 |
0.951(4) |
C19-H19 |
|
1.325 |
C25-N24 |
1.353(4) |
C8-N2 |
|
1.438 |
C5-N24 |
1.422(4) |
C9-N2 |
|
1.743 |
C12-S11 |
1.839(3) |
C15-S1 |
Table 2: Comparative experimental and DFT study of geometrical parameters of 1-Benzoyl-3-[(2-benzyl Sulfanyl)phenyl]thiourea some selected bond angles (◦)Crystal data of1-Benzoyl-3-[(2-benzyl Sulfanyl)phenyl]thiourea
|
|
Bond angles (◦) DFT |
|
Bond angles (◦) Experimental |
|
119.7 |
C31-C30-C32 |
118.4(3) |
C2-C1-C6 |
|
121.31 |
C28-C30-C31 |
125.2(3) |
C2-C1-C7 |
|
118.91 |
C28-C30-C32 |
116.4(3) |
C6-C1-C7 |
|
119.99 |
C30-C31-C33 |
120.0(3) |
C1-C2-C3 |
|
119.95 |
C31-C33-H38 |
119.7(4) |
C2-C3-H3 |
|
120.07 |
C31-C33-C37 |
120.6(3) |
C2-C3-C4 |
|
119.97 |
C37-C33-H38 |
119.7(4) |
H3-C3-C4 |
|
119.99 |
C33-C37-H40 |
119.8(4) |
C3-C4-H4 |
|
120.01 |
C33-C35-H37 |
120.4(4) |
C3-C4-C5 |
|
119.95 |
C35-C37-H40 |
119.8(4) |
H4-C4-C5 |
|
120.69 |
O29-C28-C30 |
120.9(3) |
O1-C7-C1 |
|
115.84 |
N27-C28-C30 |
118.0(3) |
N1-C7-C1 |
|
117.54 |
S26-C25-N27 |
116.6(2) |
S2 –C8-N1 |
|
125.7 |
N24-C25-N27 |
115.4(3) |
N1-C8-N2 |
|
116.17 |
C3-C4-S11 |
119.3(3) |
S1-C10-C11 |
|
119.55 |
C18-C15-H19 |
119.6(3) |
H17-C17-C18 |
|
121.01 |
C5-C4-N24 |
117.2(3) |
N2-C9-C10 |
Table3:
Crystal data of 1-Benzoyl-3-[(2-benzyl Sulfanyl)phenyl]thiourea
|
Crystal data |
|
|
C21 H18 N2 O S2 |
Formula |
|
1841.55 |
Formula weight |
|
Monoclinic |
Crystal system |
|
P 21/c |
Space group |
|
19.8574(18) Å |
a(Å) |
|
4.9195(5) Å |
b(Å) |
|
19.6197(18) Å |
c(Å) |
|
1841.5 Å3 |
V |
|
4 |
Z |
|
100 K |
T |
|
a 19.8574(18) b 4.9195(5) c19.6197(18) |
Cell Lengths |
|
α 90 β 106.089(2) γ 90 |
Cell Angles |
Table 4: The NBO Calculated Hybridizations for C21H18N2OS2 at the B3LYP/LanL2DZ.
|
B3LYP |
Atom |
Bond |
|
SP1.83 |
C2-C3 |
C-C |
|
SP2.42 |
C2-H4 |
C-H |
|
SP1.84 |
C3-C4 |
C-C |
|
SP2.76 |
C5-N24 |
C-N |
|
SP2.85 |
C12-S11 |
C-S |
|
SP1.80 |
C16-C20 |
C-C |
|
SP1.95 |
C12-H43 |
C-H |
|
SP99.99 |
C14 |
|
|
SP4.03 |
C4-S11 |
C-S |
|
SP1.78 |
C14-C16 |
C-C |
|
SP2.49 |
C15-H19 |
C-H |
|
SP2.22 |
C28-O29 |
C-O |
|
SP2.50 |
N24-H42 |
N-H |
|
SP2.02 |
C14-H17 |
C-H |
|
SP99.99 |
C12 |
|
|
SP2.43 |
C1-H7 |
C-H |
|
SP99.99 |
C6 |
|
TABLE-5-Second order perturbation theory analysis of Fock matrix in NBO basis for C21H18N2OS2 E(2)a means energy of hyper conjugative interaction (stabilization energy); b Energy difference between donor and acceptor i and j NBO orbital's; c F(i, j) is the Fock matrix element between i and j NBO orbital's
|
F(i,j)c (a.u) |
E(j)‐E(i) b(a.u) |
E(2) a(KJ/mol) |
Type |
Acceptor (j) |
TypeZ |
Donor (i) |
|
0.027 |
1.20 |
0.76 |
σ* |
C1-H7 |
σ |
C1-C2 |
|
0.057 |
0.54 |
6.24 |
σ* |
S11-C12 |
σ |
C4-S11 |
|
0.029 |
1.30 |
0.80 |
σ* |
C5-C6 |
σ |
C5-N24 |
|
0.021 |
1.03 |
0.54 |
σ* |
C1-H7 |
σ |
C6-H10 |
|
0.018 |
0.61 |
0.58 |
σ* |
C3-H9 |
σ |
S11-C12 |
|
0.044 |
1.21 |
2 |
σ* |
C13-C15 |
σ |
C12-C13 |
|
0.020 |
1.03 |
0.51 |
σ* |
C16-H21 |
σ |
C14-H7 |
|
0.022 |
1.01 |
0.60 |
σ* |
C15-H19 |
σ |
C18-H22 |
|
0.042 |
1.21 |
1.82 |
σ* |
C5-N24 |
σ |
N24-C25 |
|
0.061 |
1.08 |
4.25 |
σ* |
N24-H42 |
n |
O29 |
|
0.066 |
1.05 |
5.23 |
σ* |
C30-C32 |
σ |
C35-H39 |
|
0.021 |
1.03 |
0.53 |
σ* |
C35-H39 |
σ |
C37-H40 |
TABLE-6- Comparative experimental and DFT study of geometrical parameters of 1-Benzoyl-3-[(2-benzyl Sulfunyl)phenyl]thiourea some selected Torsion Crystal data of1-Benzoyl-3-[(2-benzyl Sulfanyl)phenyl]thiourea
|
|
Torsions DFT |
|
Torsions Experimental |
|
166.23 |
C4-C5-S11-C12 |
115.4(3) |
C15-S1-C10-C9 |
|
-20.027 |
C3-C4-S11-C12 |
-63.3(3) |
C15-S1-C10-C11 |
|
79.98 |
C35-C37-C33-H39 |
178.8(4) |
C3-C4-C5-H5 |
|
177.35 |
C3-C4-C5-N24 |
178.33(3) |
N2-C9-C10-C11 |
|
0.46 |
C3-C4-C5-C6 |
-0.15(5) |
C14-C9-C10-C11 |
|
0.9383 |
C25-N27-C28-O29 |
-0.33(5) |
C8-N1-C7-O1 |
|
-177.73 |
S26-C25-N27-C28 |
-177.5(3) |
C7-N1-C8-S2 |
|
179.49 |
H9-C3-C4-C5 |
179.6(3) |
C9-C10-C11-H11 |
|
-3.23 |
C5-N24-C25-S26 |
1.2(5) |
C9-N2-C8-S2 |
|
-0.4987 |
H19-C15-C18-H22 |
-1.3(6) |
H17-C17-C18-H18 |
|
177.35 |
C3-C4-C5-N24 |
178.3(3) |
N2-C9-C10-C11 |
|
6.01 |
H9-C3-C4-S11 |
-1.75(5) |
S1-C10-C11-H11 |
|
178.22 |
C12-C13-C15-C18 |
-175.9(3) |
C15-C16-C17-C18 |
|
-0.1382 |
H22-C18-C20-H23 |
0.8(6) |
H18-C18-C19-H19 |
|
179.85 |
C13-C14-C16-H21 |
-179.9(4) |
H20-C20-C21-C16 |
|
0.81 |
C2-C1-C6-C5 |
-0.3(5) |
C12-C13-C14-C9 |
|
-174.57 |
S11-C12-C13-C15 |
-136.0(3) |
S1-C15-C16-C17 |
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Comparative experimental and DFT study of the interatomic distances and the bond angles and structures of C21H18N2OS2. (Table 1, 2) Comparing the DFT data and experimental data show that data are similar .
The crystal data are given in (Table 3). The molecular structural backbones and the crystal packing of these compound are shown in ( Figure.3).
The NBO method is preferred to Mulliken charges, because the former provides an orbital picture that is closer to the classical Lewis structure. The NBO analysis involving atomic charges, bond orders as well as hybridizations of selected bonds are calculated at B3LYP/LANL2DZ level. The NBO calculated hybridization for C21H18N2OS2 shows that all of compounds have SPX hybridization and non planar configurations (Table4). Second order perturbation theory analysis of Fock matrix in NBO basis for C21H18N2OS2 is shown in( Table 5). Comparative experimental and DFT study of the interatomic Torsion structures of C21H18N2OS2 (Table 6).
4. CONCLUSION:
Experimental data have been taken from the article 1-benzoyl-3-[(2-benzyl sulfanyl)phenyl]thiourea. [11]
The molecular geometry, vibrational frequencies, energies and natural bond orbital (NBO) in the ground state are calculated by using the DFT (B3LYP) methods with LANL2DZ.
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Research Council of Imam Khoemieni International University by Grant No, 751387-91 and many technical supports that provided by Tarbiat Modaress University .
5. REFERENCES:
1. Yi-Bo Huang, Wen-Bin Yi, and Chun Cai "Thiourea Based Fluorous Organocatalyst" To Curr Chem(2012), vol. 308, p. 191–212. doi:10.1007/128_2011_248).
2. Miyabe, H.; Takemoto, Y. "Discovery and application of asymmetric reaction by multifunctional thioureas" Bull Chem Soc Jpn (2008), vol. 81, p785ff
3. Gupta, D., Soman, G., and Dev, S.. "Thiourea, a convenient reagent for the reductive cleavage of olefin ozonolysis products". Tetrahedron 38 (20): 3013(1982). doi:10.1016/0040-4020 (82) 80187-7.
4. Anthony Esposito. "Peñoles, UAM unveil pilot thiourea Au-Ag leaching plant - Mexico". Business News Americas (July 13, 2007).
5. Peter R. Schreiner, "Metal-free organocatalysis through explicit hydrogen bonding interactions" Chem. Soc. Rev., (2003), vol. 32, 289-296.
6. Becke, Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact Exchange J. Chem Phys(1993), A.D., 98: 5648-565
7. Sundaraganesan, N.,S. Ilakiamani, B. Dominic Joshua, Vibrational Spectroscopy investigation using ab initio and density functional theory analysis on the structure of 3, 4-dimethylbenzaldehyde.SpectrochimicaActa(2007) partA,68:680
8. Roland, A., Seppelt.K. Sundermeyer, W. 19F-Kernresonanzen an Imidoschwefeloxiddfluoriden, Z. anorg.allg . Chem(1972)., 393, 149-151.
9. Seppelt, K. Arsenpentachlorid, Angew. Chem(1976). 88, 410-41 WIREs Comput Mol Sci, Natural bond orbital methods(2012), 2: 1–42 doi: 10.1002/wcms.51
10. Bahttacharjee ,P. Gogi, V.G. Puranik, R.L. Gawadeand .Barman(2012). Acta Cryst.C68,0485-0487
Received on 09.11.2013 Modified on 10.12.2013
Accepted on 15.12.2013 © AJRC All right reserved
Asian J. Research Chem 7(1): January 2014; Page 62-66